Under which type of claim would Martha's lawsuit against the Super Mower manufacturer fall?

Martha's lawsuit against the Super Mower manufacturer would be classified under product liability, specifically breach of warranty, because this type of claim involves situations where a product fails to meet the promises or specifications made by the manufacturer or seller. In product liability cases, a breach of warranty claim asserts that the product did not perform as guaranteed, leading to harm or loss.

Under the product liability framework, warranties can be either express or implied. An express warranty is a specific promise made by the manufacturer about the product's quality or performance, while an implied warranty suggests that the product is fit for its ordinary use. If Martha’s claim indicates that the Super Mower was defective or did not fulfill the advertised promises, it would fit under breach of warranty since she is asserting that the manufacturer failed to deliver a product that met the expected standards.

Understanding this context is key, as it differentiates breach of warranty from other categories such as negligence, which involves failure to act with reasonable care, or fraud and misrepresentation, which pertain to intentional deceit or false statements rather than product performance issues.